Socartes is a very admirable person in my opinion, especially considering his circumstances. Even though he was considered ugly, was in total poverty, and had many other what we would consider hindrances, Socrates made the decision to embrace who he was and make the most of it. In Socrates case, he felt compelled to advise the youth of Athens to think for themselves, and develop their own opinions on varying subjects. But, to me, what made Socrates an excellent historical figure is he would teach only those willing to listen, he wouldn't force his opinions on others. Although, Socrates would always argue his points to those trying to disprove him, he never backed away from what he thought.
Moving on to the Apology which was written by Plato giving an account of Socrates's trial by the Athenians. I personally liked the reading, even though some of the reading was slightly challenging to grasp, particularly when Socrates was explaining different "truths" about varying subjects. But the main point that kept reoccurring to me was the Athenians were so stone set on killing Socrates strictly because they didn't want to change. Socrates never did anything but "toe stomp" on the political and justice system of Athens. So, what bothered me was the Athenians were more set on killing a man, than self-examination of their systems. Everyone, even now, tries to condemn others while turning a blind eye to what could be fixed with themselves.
Course blog for Introduction to Politics, Radford University, Fall 2012
Friday, August 31, 2012
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Welcome
Welcome to the POSC 110 Fall 2012 course blog. Please click on each of the pages at the top and get familiar with the blog's layout. We will continue to go over blogging on Thursday, August 30.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)